Daughters Have More Rights Than Boys In Ancestral Property, According To A Significant Ruling By The Supreme Court
A significant Supreme Court ruling concerning ancestor property is now becoming more prominent. which the Supreme Court decision gives daughters greater rights to inherited property than boys. Inform us in depth about this Supreme Court ruling in the news stories below.
With respect to daughters’ rights to inherit their fathers’ property, the Supreme Court has issued a significant ruling. According to the judge, if a member of a joint family passes away without leaving a will, his daughter will inherit his assets. In comparison to the boys of her father’s sibling, the daughter would be given preference when it came to receiving her share of the property. The court has also ruled that such a method will be applicable to property divisions made prior to the passage of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
The panel of Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari issued this 51-page ruling in the case of Tamil Nadu. The parent in this instance passed away in 1949. For his self-made and divided possessions, he had not created a will. Due to the fact that he was a joint family member, the Madras High Court granted rights to his brother’s boys on his father’s property. The High Court has now ruled in favor of the father’s sole daughter. This lawsuit was being fought by the daughter’s heirs.
On their father’s property, daughters have equal privileges
According to the Hindu Succession Act, daughters have an equal claim to their father’s possessions, according to the Supreme Court. The court has ruled that before this legislation went into effect, even the religious system recognized women’s property rights. The fact that a person’s property will be distributed to his daughter rather than his brother’s boys even if he doesn’t have a son has also been established in numerous judgments.
Both the property that the individual acquired on his or her own behalf and the property he or she received as part of the family division are covered by this agreement.
Since 1956, the Supreme Court has expanded this method to include the distribution of property as well. This may have an effect on the property distribution disputes that are currently pending in lesser courts all over the nation.
News Mania Desk
