US Signals Possible Exit from Iran Conflict Without Deal; Israel Suggests Continued Operations

U.S. President Donald Trump has indicated that Washington may soon withdraw from the ongoing conflict with Iran even in the absence of a formal peace agreement, raising fresh questions about the future course of the war and regional stability.

Speaking at the White House, Trump suggested that the conflict could wind down within the next two to three weeks. He emphasized that a negotiated settlement with Tehran is not a prerequisite for ending U.S. involvement, signalling a shift from traditional diplomatic approaches. Instead, the administration appears focused on achieving strategic military objectives before pulling back American forces.

The conflict, which escalated following coordinated military actions by the United States and Israel earlier this year, has significantly heightened tensions across the Middle East. Washington’s stated aim has been to weaken Iran’s military infrastructure and curb its nuclear ambitions. Trump indicated that these goals are close to being met, paving the way for a possible withdrawal. However, Israel’s stance suggests that the situation may not de-escalate as quickly as the U.S. anticipates. Israeli officials have hinted at continuing military operations against Iran, even if American forces scale down or exit the conflict. This divergence underscores a growing strategic gap between the two allies, with Israel maintaining a more aggressive posture toward Tehran.

The differing approaches have added uncertainty to an already volatile situation. While the U.S. appears inclined toward disengagement, Israel’s signals point to the possibility of prolonged hostilities. Analysts warn that such a scenario could sustain instability in the region despite a reduction in direct American involvement.

Diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis remain stalled. Previous attempts to broker a ceasefire or broader agreement have failed to gain traction, with Iran rejecting key U.S. conditions and proposing alternative terms. The absence of a mutually acceptable framework continues to hinder progress toward a lasting resolution. The conflict also carries significant global implications, particularly for energy markets. The strategically vital Strait of Hormuz remains a focal point of concern, as disruptions in the area could impact global oil supplies and drive economic uncertainty.

Trump expressed optimism that stability could return to the region following a U.S. exit, but experts caution that unresolved tensions and Israel’s potential unilateral actions may prolong the crisis. As developments unfold, the prospect of a swift end to the conflict remains uncertain, with the trajectory likely to depend on both military decisions and the possibility of renewed diplomatic engagement.